| ARCHETYPE ID | openEHR-EHR-INSTRUCTION.service_request.v1 |
|---|---|
| Concept | Service request |
| Description | Request for a health-related service or activity to be delivered by a clinician, organisation or agency. |
| Use | Use to record a request for a health-related service or activity to be delivered by a clinician, organisation or agency. This generic archetype has been designed as a framework that can be used as the basis for a wide range of requests:
It can be used to represent a request for one or more services, in one of two ways:
The 'Service due' data element supports common use cases for stipulating the simple timing for delivery of the request/s on a single occasion. For situations with more complicated timing requirements or a series of services, use the CLUSTER.service_direction archetype within the 'Complex timing' SLOT. Implementation examples:
In many situations, it will be possible to record the steps that occur as part of this request being carried out using the corresponding generic ACTION.service. However, there will be many occasions where the required ACTION archetype will be very specific for purpose, as the data requirements for recording provision of many health-related services will need quite unique data elements, recording patterns or pathway steps. For example: ACTION.screening or ACTION.health_education. |
| Misuse | Not to be used to record details about the activities that document how an order or request has been carried out - use an ACTION archetype for this purpose. For example ACTION.service archetype or a more purpose-specific archetype from the ACTION class for this purpose. |
| Purpose | A generic framework for a request for a health-related service or activity to be delivered by a clinician, organisation or agency. |
| References | |
| Copyright | © openEHR Foundation, Nasjonal IKT HF |
| Authors | Author name: Dr Ian McNicoll Organisation: Ocean Informatics, United Kingdom Email: ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com Date originally authored: 2009-12-08 |
| Other Details Language | Author name: Dr Ian McNicoll Organisation: Ocean Informatics, United Kingdom Email: ian.mcnicoll@oceaninformatics.com Date originally authored: 2009-12-08 |
| Other Details (Language Independent) |
|
| Keywords | request, order, service, provide, referral |
| Lifecycle | in_development |
| UID | d7cf88fd-5324-4005-9f1b-d0f4f8e112ba |
| Language used | en |
| Citeable Identifier | 1013.1.614 |
| Revision Number | 1.1.3-alpha |
| activities | |
| Current Activity | Current Activity: Current Activity. |
| Service name | Service name: The name of the service/s requested. Coding of the 'Service name' with an external terminology is strongly recommended, if available. This data element allows multiple occurrences to enable the user to record a multiple services as part of a single request, if required. |
| Service type | Service type: Category of service requested. Coding of the 'Service type' with an external terminology is desirable, if available. If the 'Service name' was coded, it is possible for this data point to be derived from the code. |
| Description | Description: Narrative description about the service requested. This data point should be used to describe the named service in more detail, including how it should be delivered, patient concerns and issues that might be encountered in delivering the service. |
| Clinical indication | Clinical indication: The symptom, sign or diagnosis that necessitates the requested service. Coding of the 'Clinical indication' with an external terminology is recommended, if available. This data element allows multiple occurrences to enable the user to record a multiple responses, if required. |
| Clinical context | Clinical context: Narrative information about the individual and their situation, providing relevant context for the request. |
| Reason for request | Reason for request: The specific problem needing attention or the clinical question that requires investigation. Coding of the 'Reason for request' with an external terminology is desirable, if available. This data element allows multiple occurrences to enable the user to record a multiple responses, if required. |
| Reason description | Reason description: Narrative description about the issue or clinical query that needs resolution. |
| Intent | Intent: Description of the intended outcome of the request. Coding of the 'Intent' with an external terminology is recommended, if available. This data element allows multiple occurrences to enable the user to record a multiple responses, if required. |
| Order detail | Order detail: Additional details and instructions about how the services are to be delivered. Coding of the 'Order detail' with an external terminology is desirable, if available. This data element allows multiple occurrences to enable the user to record a multiple responses, if required. |
| Urgency | Urgency: Urgency of the request for service. Specific definitions of emergency and urgent will vary between clinical contexts, clinical systems and the nature of the request itself, so have not been defined in this archetype. More precise timing requirements should be specified using the 'Service due' data element or the CLUSTER.service_direction archetype within the 'Complex timing' SLOT. Choice of:
|
| Service due | Service due: The date/time or description about timing for provision of the requested service/s. This data element allows for recording of the timing for the service/s, either as a date and time, an interval of date and time, or a text descriptor. In practice, clinicians will often think in terms of ordering services as relative or approximate timing, for example: 'next available', or in '3 months'. As clinical systems need more exact parameters to operate on, this '3 months' will usually be converted to an exact date 3 months from the date of recording and stored using this data element. If complex timing or sequences of timings are required, use the CLUSTER.service_direction archetype within the 'Complex timing' SLOT and this data element becomes redundant. Choice of:
|
| Complex timing | Complex timing: Details about a complex service request requiring a sequence of timings. For example: 'hourly vital signs observations for 4 hours, then 4 hourly for 20 hours' or 'every third Wednesday for 3 visits' or 'Day 14-16 of the menstrual cycle'. If complex timing or sequences of timings are required using the CLUSTER.service_direction archetype in this SLOT, the 'Service due' data element becomes redundant. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.service_ openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.timing_ openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.timing_ |
| Specific details | Specific details: Additional detail about the service requested. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| Supporting information | Supporting information: Digital document, image, video or diagram supplied as additional information to support or inform the request. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.media_ |
| Supplementary information | Supplementary information: Supplementary information will be following request. Record as TRUE if additional information has been identified and will be forwarded when available. For example: pending test results. Allowed values: {true} |
| Information description | Information description: Description of the supplementary information. |
| Patient requirements | Patient requirements: Language, transport or other personal requirements to support the patient's attendance or participation in provision of the service. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| Comment | Comment: Additional narrative about the service request not captured in other fields. |
| protocol | |
| Requester order identifier | Requester order identifier: The local identifier assigned by the requesting clinical system. Usually equivalent to the HL7 Placer Order Identifier. Choice of:
|
| Requester | Requester: Details about the clinician or organisation requesting the service. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.person.v1 and specialisations |
| Receiver order identifier | Receiver order identifier: The local identifier assigned to the request by the clinician or organisation receiving the request for service. Usually equivalent to the HL7 Filler Order Identifier. Choice of:
|
| Receiver | Receiver: Details about the clinician or organisation receiving the request for service. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.person.v1 and specialisations or openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.organisation.v1 and specialisations |
| Request status | Request status: The status of the request for service as indicated by the requester. Status is used to denote whether this is the initial request, or a follow-up request to change or provide supplementary information. Coding with a terminology is preferred, where possible. |
| Distribution list | Distribution list: Details of additional clinicians, organisations or agencies who require copies of any communication. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.organisation.v1 and specialisations or openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.person.v1 and specialisations |
| Urgent contact | Urgent contact: Details about the designated contact person or organisation and preferred mode of contact for urgent or emergency notifications related to this request. For example: if the outcome of the request requires an urgent or emergency response by the requester. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.person.v1 and specialisations or openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.organisation.v1 and specialisations |
| Eligibility guidance | Eligibility guidance: Advice from the requester to the receiver about the individual's eligibility for the requested service. |
| Billing guidance | Billing guidance: A recommendation from the requester to the receiver about the method of payment for the service. For example: 'Private'; 'Government insurance scheme'; or 'Private insurance'. |
| Responsible payer | Responsible payer: Details about the individual or organisation who will assume responsibility for payment of the service. This data element will only be used if a known payer has been identified. For example: an individual, such as a parent on behalf of a child; or an organisation such as a workplace or government insurance scheme. Include: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.organisation.v1 and specialisations or openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.person.v1 and specialisations |
| Extension | Extension: Additional information required to extend the model with local content or to align with other reference models or formalisms. For example: local information requirements; or additional metadata to align with FHIR. Include: All not explicitly excluded archetypes |
| Other contributors | Fatima Almeida, Critical SW, Portugal Tomas Alme, DIPS ASA, Norway Vebjørn Arntzen, Oslo University Hospital, Norway Koray Atalag, University of Auckland, New Zealand Silje Ljosland Bakke, Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway (openEHR Editor) Lars Bitsch-Larsen, Haukeland University hospital, Norway Anita Bjørnnes, Helse Bergen, Norway Lisbeth Dahlhaug, Helse Midt - Norge IT, Norway Einar Fosse, UNN HF, Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, Norway Hildegard Franke, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd., United Kingdom Heather Grain, Llewelyn Grain Informatics, Australia Knut Harboe, Stavanger Universitetssjukehus, Norway Sam Heard, Ocean Informatics, Australia Ingrid Heitmann, Oslo universitetssykehus HF, Norway Andreas Hering, Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland universitetssjukehus, Norway Anca Heyd, DIPS ASA, Norway Hilde Hollås, DIPS AS, Norway Evelyn Hovenga, EJSH Consulting, Australia Lars Ivar Mehlum, Helse Bergen HF, Norway Lars Morgan Karlsen, DIPS ASA, Norway Shinji Kobayashi, Kyoto University, Japan Heather Leslie, Atomica Informatics, Australia (openEHR Editor) Hallvard Lærum, Direktoratet for e-helse, Norway Rose Mari Eikås, Helse Bergen, Norway Ole Martin Sand, DIPS ASA, Norway Hildegard McNicoll, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd., United Kingdom Ian McNicoll, freshEHR Clinical Informatics, United Kingdom (openEHR Editor) Bjørn Næss, DIPS ASA, Norway Andrej Orel, Marand d.o.o., Slovenia Anne Pauline Anderssen, Helse Nord RHF, Norway Pablo Pazos, CaboLabs.com Health Informatics, Uruguay Rune Pedersen, Universitetssykehuset i Nord Norge, Norway Jussara Rotzsch, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil Line Silsand, Universitetssykehuset i Nord-Norge, Norway Norwegian Review Summary, Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway Line Sæle, Nasjonal IKT HF, Norway Nyree Taylor, Ocean Informatics, Australia John Tore Valand, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Norway (Nasjonal IKT redaktør) Richard Townley-O'Neill, Australian Digital Health Agency, Australia Gro-Hilde Ulriksen, Norwegian center for ehealthresearch, Norway |
| Translators |
|